Sustainability Group - what's the purpose?

Recently, I've had second thoughts about starting and establishing a new sustainability group in Seattle - after realizing the amount of work that is involved. Also, I have noticed that when I share with people the idea of creating such a group, that many people do not get it. Some people probably think I have nothing better to do. Others think issues to do with sustainability is what I am most passionate about. And I suspect that others think I just don't know what other "better" things I could be doing with my time.

So in this post I hope to quickly explains where I am coming from, and why the idea to start another sustainability group.

First of all, I'd like to suggest that striving to make your and my lifestyle a sustainable one is about responsibility. If you don't understand this, then please read on. But let me tell you right now that having actions that promote sustainability is not what gives me pleasure or what I love to do in life. I love doing activities that are energy-intensive. For example, I love driving; always have. I love snowboarding, and the long drive that it takes to get to the mountain each time. I also enjoy jet-skiing and snowmobiling. These are very fun activities, but with the current technology we have (which is centered around the Internal Combustion Engine) make is it very improbable that we will be able do these things in generations to come. Now, I say that based on what premise???

I say that based on the "theory" that fossil fuels are finite. It is that simple. It is the "belief" or understanding of a particular process: that a gasoline car will not go up if the tank is empty of gasoline, and that gasoline comes from an oil field, and that an oil field gets empty after the oil is extracted, and that the number of oil fields that on planet earth that we can tap into to extract the oil is finite, that is, it gets used up and there's no more. If you can follow this much logic, then you understand that oil gets used up and then there's no more. So a lifestyle that is dependent on petroleum is not sustainable, which is to say that when there's no more oil those activities will come to an end. This includes everything that depends on petroleum, and petroleum is pretty much on everything around us - not just in the form of liquid fuels.

I'd like to suggest that one reason why people don't easily and readily understand this connection is because we have been living in a delusional society that pretends that we will forever have fossil fuels to burn. Of course this is not the case. And one thing that has contributed to that is language: the fact that oil companies claim they "produce" oil. But we humans - thanks to the great work of oil geologists - understand that no one can make petroleum. There's no formula for making petroleum. We have a grasp of what this formula is, but it takes millions of years and the right "cooking" conditions of the planet for dead matter to be converted to oil. In short, oil companies simply extract oil from underground, but they do not produce oil. Yet the term "oil production" subliminally tells us that there will always be oil, and as a result the way our fossil fuel based societies function and our lifestyles will never have to change. But we humans who are doing some thinking know that this is not the case.

So, once you understand this logic of resources being finite, which introduces the topic of unsustainability, a question inevitably arises. The question is "how much oil (in our case) do we have left?", which is another way of asking "for how much longer can we carry on our current lifestyle?"

Well, some people have already tried to come up with the answer to this question. Being that there's so much secrecy around the numbers that indicate the amount of oil reserves that each country has, it's virtually impossible to come up with an answer that is accurate. But I trust that we can come close. If economic activity continued to increase as well as the world oil consumption which has grown steadily at 2% per year, then we should have about 90 years left before petroleum completely ran out; give or take some years.

If I look at it this way, then my lifestyle of driving is irresponsible because if I have children and grandchildren, I am contributing to a world where in their lifetime there is no oil left. It is hard to imagine what that world will be like, but it will be a very different world.

I have written this just so people can understand that building and promoting a sustainability group is not what I like to do. It's not even in my comfort zone. But it is what I consider the responsible thing to do. I still love driving. But what future will I build for myself and future generations if my actions remain the same? What future will you build if you make no contributions to building a lifestyle that is sustainable.

If the earth's resources - and we're focusing on fossil fuels here - are finite, then we can use the analogy of a pie. The pie represents resources. With an ever-increasing world population and a pie that gets smaller by the day, you can start having an idea of what the future holds for humanity: more people competing for less pie, or fewer resources. This is not a pretty picture. But if we learn to live sustainably, then it can be. There's hope, but it lies in how much we can and are willing to adapt so that we do not rely on finite resources for our sustenance. How to achieve such lifestyle will be the focus of our sustainability group: in the form of discussions that will provide solutions, and actions to implement those solutions and make them part of our lives.

Lastly, I want to say that I am still open to the idea of new technologies that will allow us to have a particular standard of living. But I am taking no responsibility for inventing those technologies, and I don't trust that anyone else will. Notice that when these technologies for "free energy" are mentioned by someone, they are always referring to "someone else or company out there" coming up with such solution and not themselves. Because I don't believe that I can come up with or participate in inventing such solutions, I am choosing to promote actions that are sustainable that can be part of our lifestyle now and in the future.

Thank you for reading.

BP and Shell post big profits in era of record oil prices

BP and Shell post big profits in era of record oil prices

By JANE WARDELL, AP Business Writer
Tue Apr 29, 12:36 PM ET

BP PLC and Royal Dutch Shell PLC, Europe's two biggest oil producers, posted forecast-busting first-quarter earnings on Tuesday thanks to record crude oil prices that are expected to bolster profits across the industry.

The combined profits of $17 billion reignited calls for a windfall tax on oil profits as consumers struggle to pay for food and fuel.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown suggested that some of those profits should be reinvested in costly exploration for new oil reserves in the North Sea.

BP posted a 63 percent surge in first-quarter net profit to $7.6 billion (4.9 billion euros), while Shell reported a 25 percent rise, to a record $9.08 billion (5.81 billion euros).

Revenue at BP jumped 44 percent to $89.2 billion (57.1 billion euros), while sales at Shell soared 55 percent to $114 billion (72.95 billion euros).

Last week ConocoPhillips reported a 16 percent rise in net income to $4.14 billion. Like BP and Shell, the third biggest U.S. producer far outpaced industry expectations. More big profits are expected from the biggest two U.S. companies, Exxon Mobil Corp. and Chevron Corp., when they report first-quarter earnings later this week.

Crude oil hit $111.80 per barrel during the quarter, while gas jumped an average of 22 percent. Crude has pushed even higher since, reaching a record $119.93 per-barrel this week.

BP shares jumped 6 percent to 613 pence ($12.18), while Shell rose 4.5 percent to 25.83 euros ($40.39).

The enormous profit reports from European companies coincided with the end of a two-day refinery strike in Britain that shut off 700,000 barrels of oil per day, brought from the North Sea to a BP plant.

Truck drivers staged a protest in London's Park Lane on Tuesday, blaring their horns to protest a 30 percent rise in the price of diesel over the past year. A similar protest took place in Washington, D.C. on Monday, and it wasn't the first.

"The price of fuel is becoming something many families are struggling with," said Sheila Ranger, a spokeswoman for the RAC Foundation, a commuter advocacy group. "This will be the last straw for some motorists."

Shell's Chief Financial Officer Peter Voser said oil companies are not to blame.

"We don't understand the oil price at this stage," he said. "The fundamentals will not justify an oil price as we see it at the moment."

Shell's earnings from oil production rose 52 percent to $5.14 billion (3.3 billion euros), due almost entirely to the price increases. The company said combined production of gas and oil equivalents increased by less than 1 percent to 3.4 million barrels per day, as a 9 percent rise in gas production outweighed a 6 percent fall in oil production.

Stripping out the impact of oil inventories that have risen in value, refining profits would have fallen 20 percent, Shell said.

"It seems that better marketing and trading were able to offset the weak refining environment," analyst Alexandre Weinberg of Petercam.

Shell has invested heavily to improve production after a string of setbacks, including an accounting scandal in 2004. More recently, it has faced attacks on its pipelines in Nigeria and a forced sale of part of its stake in a major project on Russia's Sakhalin Island to a state-run enterprise.

BP's profit follows an even rougher period for the company from production outages, U.S. environmental fines and fraud and the scandal-tinged departure of its chief executive.

Chief Executive Tony Hayward, who took over from John Browne a year ago, has focused on bringing new production and refining capacity on line to improve earnings.

"At last, it appears that BP is beginning to improve its operational performance and this looks set to drive a stronger financial performance in the second half," said Tony Shephard, analyst at Charles Stanley & Co.

BP's closely watched replacement cost profit rose 48 percent to $6.59 billion (4.34 billion euros), compared with $4.44 billion in the first quarter of 2007. The replacement cost figure is viewed by many analysts as the best measure of an oil company's underlying performance because it excludes changes in the value of crude inventories, measuring the amount it would cost to replace assets at current prices.

The company said refining availability improved for the sixth successive quarter.

"BP is still not firing on all cylinders but its operational turnaround looks to be on track with a strong second half recovery in prospect," said Charles Stanley & Co. analyst Tony Shephard.

___

AP Business Writer Toby Sterling in Amsterdam contributed to this report.

BP and Shell post big profits in era of record oil prices

BP and Shell post big profits in era of record oil prices

By JANE WARDELL, AP Business Writer
Tue Apr 29, 12:36 PM ET

BP PLC and Royal Dutch Shell PLC, Europe's two biggest oil producers, posted forecast-busting first-quarter earnings on Tuesday thanks to record crude oil prices that are expected to bolster profits across the industry.

The combined profits of $17 billion reignited calls for a windfall tax on oil profits as consumers struggle to pay for food and fuel.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown suggested that some of those profits should be reinvested in costly exploration for new oil reserves in the North Sea.

BP posted a 63 percent surge in first-quarter net profit to $7.6 billion (4.9 billion euros), while Shell reported a 25 percent rise, to a record $9.08 billion (5.81 billion euros).

Revenue at BP jumped 44 percent to $89.2 billion (57.1 billion euros), while sales at Shell soared 55 percent to $114 billion (72.95 billion euros).

Last week ConocoPhillips reported a 16 percent rise in net income to $4.14 billion. Like BP and Shell, the third biggest U.S. producer far outpaced industry expectations. More big profits are expected from the biggest two U.S. companies, Exxon Mobil Corp. and Chevron Corp., when they report first-quarter earnings later this week.

Crude oil hit $111.80 per barrel during the quarter, while gas jumped an average of 22 percent. Crude has pushed even higher since, reaching a record $119.93 per-barrel this week.

BP shares jumped 6 percent to 613 pence ($12.18), while Shell rose 4.5 percent to 25.83 euros ($40.39).

The enormous profit reports from European companies coincided with the end of a two-day refinery strike in Britain that shut off 700,000 barrels of oil per day, brought from the North Sea to a BP plant.

Truck drivers staged a protest in London's Park Lane on Tuesday, blaring their horns to protest a 30 percent rise in the price of diesel over the past year. A similar protest took place in Washington, D.C. on Monday, and it wasn't the first.

"The price of fuel is becoming something many families are struggling with," said Sheila Ranger, a spokeswoman for the RAC Foundation, a commuter advocacy group. "This will be the last straw for some motorists."

Shell's Chief Financial Officer Peter Voser said oil companies are not to blame.

"We don't understand the oil price at this stage," he said. "The fundamentals will not justify an oil price as we see it at the moment."

Shell's earnings from oil production rose 52 percent to $5.14 billion (3.3 billion euros), due almost entirely to the price increases. The company said combined production of gas and oil equivalents increased by less than 1 percent to 3.4 million barrels per day, as a 9 percent rise in gas production outweighed a 6 percent fall in oil production.

Stripping out the impact of oil inventories that have risen in value, refining profits would have fallen 20 percent, Shell said.

"It seems that better marketing and trading were able to offset the weak refining environment," analyst Alexandre Weinberg of Petercam.

Shell has invested heavily to improve production after a string of setbacks, including an accounting scandal in 2004. More recently, it has faced attacks on its pipelines in Nigeria and a forced sale of part of its stake in a major project on Russia's Sakhalin Island to a state-run enterprise.

BP's profit follows an even rougher period for the company from production outages, U.S. environmental fines and fraud and the scandal-tinged departure of its chief executive.

Chief Executive Tony Hayward, who took over from John Browne a year ago, has focused on bringing new production and refining capacity on line to improve earnings.

"At last, it appears that BP is beginning to improve its operational performance and this looks set to drive a stronger financial performance in the second half," said Tony Shephard, analyst at Charles Stanley & Co.

BP's closely watched replacement cost profit rose 48 percent to $6.59 billion (4.34 billion euros), compared with $4.44 billion in the first quarter of 2007. The replacement cost figure is viewed by many analysts as the best measure of an oil company's underlying performance because it excludes changes in the value of crude inventories, measuring the amount it would cost to replace assets at current prices.

The company said refining availability improved for the sixth successive quarter.

"BP is still not firing on all cylinders but its operational turnaround looks to be on track with a strong second half recovery in prospect," said Charles Stanley & Co. analyst Tony Shephard.

___

AP Business Writer Toby Sterling in Amsterdam contributed to this report.

The Recycling Machine.

Posting a link and the content of a web site that talks about this revolutionary product called "the recycling machine".

http://www.popsci.com/popsci/flat/bown/2007/innovator_2.html

INNOVATORS

Left: Frank Pringle [right] and Hawk Hogan [left] feed the Hawk recycler, which extracts oil and gas from waste like tires.

Green Tech
THE MICROWAVE MAGICIAN

Frank Pringle has found a way to squeeze oil and gas from just about anything

I’m not sure if I’m watching a magic trick, or an invention that will make the cigar-chomping 64-year-old next to me the richest man on the planet. Everything that goes into Frank Pringle’s recycling machine—a piece of tire, a rock, a plastic cup—turns to oil and natural gas seconds later. “I’ve been told the oil companies might try to assassinate me,” Pringle says without sarcasm.

The machine is a microwave emitter that extracts the petroleum and gas hidden inside everyday objects—or at least anything made with hydrocarbons, which, it turns out, is most of what’s around you. Every hour, the first commercial version will turn 10 tons of auto waste—tires, plastic, vinyl—into enough natural gas to produce 17 million BTUs of energy (it will use 956,000 of those BTUs to keep itself running).

Pringle created the machine about 10 years ago after he drove by a massive tire fire and thought about the energy being released. He went home and threw bits of a tire in a microwave emitter he’d been working with for another project. It turned to what looked like ash, but a few hours later, he returned and found a black puddle on the floor of the unheated workshop. Somehow, he’d struck oil.

Or rather, he had extracted it. Petroleum is composed of strings of hydrocarbon molecules. When microwaves hit the tire, they crack the molecular chains and break it into its component parts: carbon black (an ash-like raw material) and hydrocarbon gases, which can be burned or condensed into liquid fuel. Pringle figured that some gases from his microwaved tire had lingered, and the cold air in the shop had condensed them into diesel. If the process worked on tires, he thought, it should work on anything with hydrocarbons. The trick was in finding the optimum microwave frequency for each material—out of 10 million possibilities.

Pringle has spent 10 years and $1 million homing in on frequencies for hundreds of materials. In 2004 he teamed up with engineer pal Hawk Hogan to take the machine commercial.

Their first order is under construction in Rockford, Illinois. It’s a $5.1-million microwave machine the size of small bus called the Hawk, bound for an auto-recycler in Long Island, New York. More deals loom: The U.S. military may use Hawks in Iraq on waste such as water bottles and food containers. Oil companies are looking to the machines to gasify petroleum trapped in shale.

Back at the shop, Pringle is still zapping new materials. A sample labeled “bituminous coal” goes in and, 15 seconds later, Pringle ignites the resulting gas. “You see,” he says, “why they might want to kill me.” —RENA MARIE PACELLA

The Recycling Machine.

Posting a link and the content of a web site that talks about this revolutionary product called "the recycling machine".

http://www.popsci.com/popsci/flat/bown/2007/innovator_2.html

INNOVATORS

Left: Frank Pringle [right] and Hawk Hogan [left] feed the Hawk recycler, which extracts oil and gas from waste like tires.

Green Tech
THE MICROWAVE MAGICIAN

Frank Pringle has found a way to squeeze oil and gas from just about anything

I’m not sure if I’m watching a magic trick, or an invention that will make the cigar-chomping 64-year-old next to me the richest man on the planet. Everything that goes into Frank Pringle’s recycling machine—a piece of tire, a rock, a plastic cup—turns to oil and natural gas seconds later. “I’ve been told the oil companies might try to assassinate me,” Pringle says without sarcasm.

The machine is a microwave emitter that extracts the petroleum and gas hidden inside everyday objects—or at least anything made with hydrocarbons, which, it turns out, is most of what’s around you. Every hour, the first commercial version will turn 10 tons of auto waste—tires, plastic, vinyl—into enough natural gas to produce 17 million BTUs of energy (it will use 956,000 of those BTUs to keep itself running).

Pringle created the machine about 10 years ago after he drove by a massive tire fire and thought about the energy being released. He went home and threw bits of a tire in a microwave emitter he’d been working with for another project. It turned to what looked like ash, but a few hours later, he returned and found a black puddle on the floor of the unheated workshop. Somehow, he’d struck oil.

Or rather, he had extracted it. Petroleum is composed of strings of hydrocarbon molecules. When microwaves hit the tire, they crack the molecular chains and break it into its component parts: carbon black (an ash-like raw material) and hydrocarbon gases, which can be burned or condensed into liquid fuel. Pringle figured that some gases from his microwaved tire had lingered, and the cold air in the shop had condensed them into diesel. If the process worked on tires, he thought, it should work on anything with hydrocarbons. The trick was in finding the optimum microwave frequency for each material—out of 10 million possibilities.

Pringle has spent 10 years and $1 million homing in on frequencies for hundreds of materials. In 2004 he teamed up with engineer pal Hawk Hogan to take the machine commercial.

Their first order is under construction in Rockford, Illinois. It’s a $5.1-million microwave machine the size of small bus called the Hawk, bound for an auto-recycler in Long Island, New York. More deals loom: The U.S. military may use Hawks in Iraq on waste such as water bottles and food containers. Oil companies are looking to the machines to gasify petroleum trapped in shale.

Back at the shop, Pringle is still zapping new materials. A sample labeled “bituminous coal” goes in and, 15 seconds later, Pringle ignites the resulting gas. “You see,” he says, “why they might want to kill me.” —RENA MARIE PACELLA